Ryzen AI Max+ 395 vs Atom x7-Z8750

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom x7-Z8750
2016, $37
4 cores / 4 threads, 2 Watt
0.73
Ryzen AI Max+ 395
2025
16 cores / 32 threads, 55 Watt
31.13
+4164%

Ryzen AI Max+ 395 outperforms Atom x7-Z8750 by a whopping 4164% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2895165
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Series7x Intel Atomno data
Power efficiencyno data60.77
DesignerIntelAMD
Manufacturerno dataTSMC
Architecture codenameCherry Trail (2015−2016)Strix Halo (2025)
Release date1 April 2016 (9 years ago)6 January 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$37no data

Detailed specifications

Atom x7-Z8750 and Ryzen AI Max+ 395 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads432
Base clock speed1.6 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed2.56 GHz5.1 GHz
Multiplier16no data
L1 cacheno data80 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm4 nm
Die sizeno data2x 70.6 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Atom x7-Z8750 and Ryzen AI Max+ 395 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketUTFCBGA1380FP11
Power consumption (TDP)2 MB55 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom x7-Z8750 and Ryzen AI Max+ 395. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataUSB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A
AES-NI++
AVX-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Atom x7-Z8750 and Ryzen AI Max+ 395 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

Secure Boot+no data
Identity Protection+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom x7-Z8750 and Ryzen AI Max+ 395 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom x7-Z8750 and Ryzen AI Max+ 395. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 405 (Braswell) (400 - 600 MHz)AMD Radeon 8060S
Max video memory8 GBno data
Graphics max frequency600 MHzno data
Execution Units16no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Atom x7-Z8750 and Ryzen AI Max+ 395 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Atom x7-Z8750 and Ryzen AI Max+ 395 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.43840x2160no data
Max resolution over eDP2560x1600no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom x7-Z8750 and Ryzen AI Max+ 395.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanes216
USB revision3.0no data
Number of USB ports3no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Atom x7-Z8750 0.73
Ryzen AI Max+ 395 31.13
+4164%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Atom x7-Z8750 1294
Samples: 101
Ryzen AI Max+ 395 55006
+4151%
Samples: 521

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Atom x7-Z8750 181
Ryzen AI Max+ 395 2792
+1443%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Atom x7-Z8750 520
Ryzen AI Max+ 395 17677
+3299%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Atom x7-Z8750 24.7
Ryzen AI Max+ 395 2.55
+869%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Atom x7-Z8750 133
Ryzen AI Max+ 395 5488
+4026%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Atom x7-Z8750 39
Ryzen AI Max+ 395 317
+715%

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Atom x7-Z8750 1
Ryzen AI Max+ 395 20.2
+2004%

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Atom x7-Z8750 10
Ryzen AI Max+ 395 189
+1794%

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Atom x7-Z8750 48
Ryzen AI Max+ 395 326
+578%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.73 31.13
Integrated graphics card 0.69 43.10
Recency 1 April 2016 6 January 2025
Physical cores 4 16
Threads 4 32
Chip lithography 14 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 2 Watt 55 Watt

Atom x7-Z8750 has 2650% lower power consumption.

Ryzen AI Max+ 395, on the other hand, has a 4164.4% higher aggregate performance score, 6146.4% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 8 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Atom x7-Z8750 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom x7-Z8750
Atom x7-Z8750
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395
Ryzen AI Max+ 395

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.1 23 votes

Rate Atom x7-Z8750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 129 votes

Rate Ryzen AI Max 395 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Atom x7-Z8750 and Ryzen AI Max+ 395, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.