i7-620M vs Atom x7-E3950

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom x7-E3950
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 12 Watt
1.16
Core i7-620M
2010
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
1.24
+6.9%

Core i7-620M outperforms Atom x7-E3950 by a small 7% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Atom x7-E3950 and Core i7-620M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking24242369
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Series7x Intel AtomIntel Core i7
Power efficiency9.203.37
Architecture codenameApollo Lake (2014−2016)Arrandale (2010−2011)
Release date30 August 2014 (10 years ago)7 January 2010 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$57$332

Detailed specifications

Atom x7-E3950 and Core i7-620M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads44
Base clock speed1.6 GHz2.66 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz3.33 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 1.0
Bus rateno data1 × 2.5 GT/s
Multiplierno data15
L1 cache56K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (shared)256K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data81+114 mm2
Maximum core temperature110 °C105 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)103 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data384 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Atom x7-E3950 and Core i7-620M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketIntel BGA 1296BGA1288,PGA988
Power consumption (TDP)12 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom x7-E3950 and Core i7-620M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
FMA-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technologyno data+
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
PAEno data36 Bit
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+

Security technologies

Atom x7-E3950 and Core i7-620M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom x7-E3950 and Core i7-620M are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom x7-E3950 and Core i7-620M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR3
Maximum memory size8 GB8 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data17.051 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 505 (500 - 650 MHz)Intel HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel Processors
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data766 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Atom x7-E3950 and Core i7-620M integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom x7-E3950 and Core i7-620M.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes416

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Atom x7-E3950 1.16
i7-620M 1.24
+6.9%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom x7-E3950 1864
i7-620M 1980
+6.2%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Atom x7-E3950 229
i7-620M 442
+93%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Atom x7-E3950 714
i7-620M 822
+15.1%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Atom x7-E3950 1304
i7-620M 3473
+166%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Atom x7-E3950 3769
i7-620M 7657
+103%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Atom x7-E3950 2152
i7-620M 3044
+41.4%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Atom x7-E3950 30.26
i7-620M 18
+68.1%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Atom x7-E3950 2
i7-620M 2
+49.7%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.16 1.24
Integrated graphics card 0.92 0.77
Recency 30 August 2014 7 January 2010
Physical cores 4 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 35 Watt

Atom x7-E3950 has 19.5% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 4 years, 100% more physical cores, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 191.7% lower power consumption.

i7-620M, on the other hand, has a 6.9% higher aggregate performance score.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Atom x7-E3950 and Core i7-620M.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom x7-E3950
Atom x7-E3950
Intel Core i7-620M
Core i7-620M

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 49 votes

Rate Atom x7-E3950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 343 votes

Rate Core i7-620M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Atom x7-E3950 and Core i7-620M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.