Celeron J3455 vs Atom x7-E3950

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Atom x7-E3950
2014
4 cores / 4 threads
1.21
Celeron J3455
2016
4 cores / 4 threads
1.46
+20.7%

Celeron J3455 outperforms Atom x7-E3950 by 21% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary Details

Comparing Atom x7-E3950 and Celeron J3455 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking22192059
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Series7x Intel AtomIntel Celeron
Architecture codenameApollo Lake (2016)Apollo Lake (2016)
Release date30 August 2014 (9 years ago)30 August 2016 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$57$107
Current price$377 (6.6x MSRP)$189 (1.8x MSRP)

Detailed Specifications

Atom x7-E3950 and Celeron J3455 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed1.6 GHz1.5 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz2.3 GHz
L1 cache56K (per core)no data
L2 cache2 MB (shared)2 MB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature110 °C105 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)103 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Atom x7-E3950 and Celeron J3455 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketIntel BGA 1296FCBGA1296
Power consumption (TDP)12 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom x7-E3950 and Celeron J3455. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoringno data+
SIPPno data-
Smart Responseno data-
GPIOno data+
Smart Connectno data-
Statusno dataLaunched
HD Audiono data+
RSTno data-

Security technologies

Atom x7-E3950 and Celeron J3455 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDBno data+
Secure Bootno data+
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protectionno data+
OS Guardno data-
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom x7-E3950 and Celeron J3455 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
VT-ino data-
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom x7-E3950 and Celeron J3455. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR3L/LPDDR3 up to 1866 MT/s; LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/s
Maximum memory size8 GB8 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
ECC memory supportno data-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 505Intel HD Graphics 500
Max video memoryno data8 GB
Quick Sync Videono data+
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data750 MHz
Execution Unitsno data12

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Atom x7-E3950 and Celeron J3455 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPortno data+
HDMIno data+
MIPI-DSIno data+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Atom x7-E3950 and Celeron J3455 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data+
OpenGLno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom x7-E3950 and Celeron J3455.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes46
USB revisionno data2.0/3.0
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data8
Integrated LANno data-
UARTno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Atom x7-E3950 1.21
Celeron J3455 1.46
+20.7%

Celeron J3455 outperforms Atom x7-E3950 by 21% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Atom x7-E3950 1864
Celeron J3455 2256
+21%

Celeron J3455 outperforms Atom x7-E3950 by 21% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Atom x7-E3950 233
Celeron J3455 254
+9%

Celeron J3455 outperforms Atom x7-E3950 by 9% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Atom x7-E3950 717
Celeron J3455 751
+4.7%

Celeron J3455 outperforms Atom x7-E3950 by 5% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & Cons Summary


Performance score 1.21 1.46
Integrated graphics card 0.86 0.75
Recency 30 August 2014 30 August 2016
Cost $57 $107
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 10 Watt

The Celeron J3455 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom x7-E3950 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom x7-E3950 and Celeron J3455, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom x7-E3950
Atom x7-E3950
Intel Celeron J3455
Celeron J3455

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 44 votes

Rate Atom x7-E3950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 187 votes

Rate Celeron J3455 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about Atom x7-E3950 or Celeron J3455, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.