Celeron N2807 vs Atom x5-Z8550

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Atom x5-Z8550 and Celeron N2807 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2650not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Series5x Intel AtomIntel Celeron
Architecture codenameCherry Trail (2015−2016)Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
Release date8 February 2016 (8 years ago)23 February 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$107

Detailed specifications

Atom x5-Z8550 and Celeron N2807 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed1.44 GHz1.58 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz2.16 GHz
L1 cacheno data56K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm22 nm
Maximum core temperature90 °C105 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Atom x5-Z8550 and Celeron N2807 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketUTFCBGA1380FCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)no data4.3 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom x5-Z8550 and Celeron N2807. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Smart Connectno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
RSTno data-

Security technologies

Atom x5-Z8550 and Celeron N2807 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDBno data+
Secure Boot+no data
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection+-
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom x5-Z8550 and Celeron N2807 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data-
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom x5-Z8550 and Celeron N2807. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size8 GB4 GB
Max memory channels21
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)Intel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Series
Max video memory8 GBno data
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequency600 MHz750 MHz
Execution Units12no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Atom x5-Z8550 and Celeron N2807 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported32

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Atom x5-Z8550 and Celeron N2807 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.43840x2160no data
Max resolution over eDP2560x1600no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom x5-Z8550 and Celeron N2807.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes24
USB revision3.03.0 and 2.0
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Number of USB ports35

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom x5-Z8550 1156
+138%
Celeron N2807 486

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Atom x5-Z8550 174
+15.2%
Celeron N2807 151

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Atom x5-Z8550 495
+99.6%
Celeron N2807 248

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Atom x5-Z8550 134
+106%
Celeron N2807 65

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Atom x5-Z8550 36
+2.9%
Celeron N2807 35

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 February 2016 23 February 2014
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 22 nm

Atom x5-Z8550 has an age advantage of 1 year, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Atom x5-Z8550 and Celeron N2807. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom x5-Z8550 and Celeron N2807, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom x5-Z8550
Atom x5-Z8550
Intel Celeron N2807
Celeron N2807

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 22 votes

Rate Atom x5-Z8550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 34 votes

Rate Celeron N2807 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom x5-Z8550 or Celeron N2807, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.