Core i3-1215U vs Atom x5-Z8500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom x5-Z8500
2015
4 cores / 4 threads
0.80
Core i3-1215U
2022
6 cores / 8 threads, 15 Watt
7.11
+789%

Core i3-1215U outperforms Atom x5-Z8500 by a whopping 789% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Atom x5-Z8500 and Core i3-1215U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2507925
Place by popularitynot in top-10020
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Series5x Intel AtomIntel Alder Lake-M
Architecture codenameCherry Trail (2016)Alder Lake-U (2022)
Release date2 March 2015 (9 years ago)23 February 2022 (2 years ago)
Current price$191 no data

Detailed specifications

Atom x5-Z8500 and Core i3-1215U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads48
Base clock speed1.44 GHz1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.24 GHz4.4 GHz
L1 cacheno data80K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB10 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Maximum core temperature90 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Atom x5-Z8500 and Core i3-1215U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketUTFCBGA1380FCBGA1744
Power consumption (TDP)no data15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom x5-Z8500 and Core i3-1215U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
FMAno data+
AVXno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSXno data+
Thermal Monitoringno data+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
StatusDiscontinuedLaunched

Security technologies

Atom x5-Z8500 and Core i3-1215U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Boot+no data
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection+no data
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom x5-Z8500 and Core i3-1215U are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom x5-Z8500 and Core i3-1215U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4, DDR5
Maximum memory size8 GB64 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory supportno data-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD GraphicsIntel® UHD Graphics for 12th Gen Intel® Processors
Max video memory8 GBno data
Quick Sync Videono data+
Graphics max frequency600 MHz1.1 GHz
Execution Units1264

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Atom x5-Z8500 and Core i3-1215U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported34

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Atom x5-Z8500 and Core i3-1215U integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.43840x21604096 x 2304 @ 60Hz
Max resolution over eDP2560x16004096 x 2304 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Atom x5-Z8500 and Core i3-1215U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12.1
OpenGLno data4.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom x5-Z8500 and Core i3-1215U.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanes220
USB revision3.0no data
Number of USB ports3no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Atom x5-Z8500 0.80
i3-1215U 7.11
+789%

Core i3-1215U outperforms Atom x5-Z8500 by 789% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Atom x5-Z8500 1236
i3-1215U 10998
+790%

Core i3-1215U outperforms Atom x5-Z8500 by 790% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Atom x5-Z8500 171
i3-1215U 1862
+989%

Core i3-1215U outperforms Atom x5-Z8500 by 989% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Atom x5-Z8500 490
i3-1215U 4929
+906%

Core i3-1215U outperforms Atom x5-Z8500 by 906% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Atom x5-Z8500 1166
i3-1215U 7879
+576%

Core i3-1215U outperforms Atom x5-Z8500 by 576% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Atom x5-Z8500 3563
i3-1215U 19430
+445%

Core i3-1215U outperforms Atom x5-Z8500 by 445% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Atom x5-Z8500 1
i3-1215U 11
+733%

Core i3-1215U outperforms Atom x5-Z8500 by 733% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Atom x5-Z8500 107
i3-1215U 809
+660%

Core i3-1215U outperforms Atom x5-Z8500 by 660% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Atom x5-Z8500 36
i3-1215U 218
+513%

Core i3-1215U outperforms Atom x5-Z8500 by 513% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Atom x5-Z8500 0.43
i3-1215U 2.79
+549%

Core i3-1215U outperforms Atom x5-Z8500 by 549% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Atom x5-Z8500 0.6
i3-1215U 11.6
+1713%

Core i3-1215U outperforms Atom x5-Z8500 by 1713% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Atom x5-Z8500 872
i3-1215U 7944
+811%

Core i3-1215U outperforms Atom x5-Z8500 by 811% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Atom x5-Z8500 7
i3-1215U 50
+593%

Core i3-1215U outperforms Atom x5-Z8500 by 593% in x264 encoding pass 2.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Atom x5-Z8500 37
i3-1215U 199
+445%

Core i3-1215U outperforms Atom x5-Z8500 by 445% in x264 encoding pass 1.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.80 7.11
Recency 2 March 2015 23 February 2022
Physical cores 4 6
Threads 4 8

The Core i3-1215U is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom x5-Z8500 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom x5-Z8500 and Core i3-1215U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom x5-Z8500
Atom x5-Z8500
Intel Core i3-1215U
Core i3-1215U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 15 votes

Rate Atom x5-Z8500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 2085 votes

Rate Core i3-1215U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom x5-Z8500 or Core i3-1215U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.