Celeron U3400 vs Atom x5-Z8350

VS

Primary details

Comparing Atom x5-Z8350 and Celeron U3400 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2823not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Series5x Intel AtomIntel Celeron
Architecture codenameCherry Trail (2015−2016)Westmere (2010−2011)
Release date8 February 2016 (8 years ago)24 May 2010 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Atom x5-Z8350 and Celeron U3400 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed1.44 GHz1.06 GHz
Boost clock speed1.92 GHz0.07 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 1.0
Bus rateno data1 × 2.5 GT/s
Multiplierno data8
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cache2 MB512 KB
L3 cache0 KB2 MB
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data81 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C105 °C
Number of transistorsno data382 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Atom x5-Z8350 and Celeron U3400 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketUTFCBGA592BGA1288
Power consumption (TDP)no data18 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom x5-Z8350 and Celeron U3400. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
FMA-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
PAEno data36 Bit
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+

Security technologies

Atom x5-Z8350 and Celeron U3400 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+
Secure Boot+no data
Identity Protection+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom x5-Z8350 and Celeron U3400 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data-
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom x5-Z8350 and Celeron U3400. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types4 GBDDR3-800
Maximum memory size2 GB8 GB
Max memory channels12
Maximum memory bandwidth12.8 GB/s12.799 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD GraphicsIntel® HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel® Processors
Max video memory2 GBno data
Clear Videono data+
Graphics max frequency500 MHz500 MHz
Execution Units12no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Atom x5-Z8350 and Celeron U3400 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported22

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Atom x5-Z8350 and Celeron U3400 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.41920x1080no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom x5-Z8350 and Celeron U3400.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes116
USB revision3.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom x5-Z8350 892
+72.9%
Celeron U3400 516

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Atom x5-Z8350 136
Celeron U3400 176
+29.4%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Atom x5-Z8350 370
+18.2%
Celeron U3400 313

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 February 2016 24 May 2010
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm

Atom x5-Z8350 has an age advantage of 5 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Atom x5-Z8350 and Celeron U3400. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom x5-Z8350 and Celeron U3400, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom x5-Z8350
Atom x5-Z8350
Intel Celeron U3400
Celeron U3400

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 377 votes

Rate Atom x5-Z8350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 30 votes

Rate Celeron U3400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom x5-Z8350 or Celeron U3400, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.