Atom N2800 vs x5-Z8330

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Atom x5-Z8330 and Atom N2800 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2832not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Series5x Intel AtomIntel Atom
Architecture codenameAirmont (2016)Cedarview-M (2011−2012)
Release date8 February 2016 (8 years ago)28 December 2011 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$47

Detailed specifications

Atom x5-Z8330 and Atom N2800 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads44
Base clock speed1.44 GHz1.86 GHz
Boost clock speed1.92 GHz1.86 GHz
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB1 MB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data66 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data176 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Atom x5-Z8330 and Atom N2800 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
Socketno dataFCBGA559
Power consumption (TDP)no data6.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom x5-Z8330 and Atom N2800. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
AES-NI+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Atom x5-Z8330 and Atom N2800 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+
Identity Protection+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom x5-Z8330 and Atom N2800 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data-
VT-xno data-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom x5-Z8330 and Atom N2800. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L-RS 1600DDR3
Maximum memory size2 GB4.88 GB
Max memory channels11
Maximum memory bandwidth12.8 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650
Graphics max frequency500 MHzno data
Execution Units12no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Atom x5-Z8330 and Atom N2800 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom x5-Z8330 and Atom N2800.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes1no data
USB revision3.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom x5-Z8330 809
+82.2%
Atom N2800 444

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 February 2016 28 December 2011
Physical cores 4 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm

Atom x5-Z8330 has an age advantage of 4 years, 100% more physical cores, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Atom x5-Z8330 and Atom N2800. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom x5-Z8330 and Atom N2800, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom x5-Z8330
Atom x5-Z8330
Intel Atom N2800
Atom N2800

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 9 votes

Rate Atom x5-Z8330 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 101 vote

Rate Atom N2800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom x5-Z8330 or Atom N2800, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.