Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX vs Atom x5-E8000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom x5-E8000
2016
4 cores / 4 threads, 5 Watt
0.55
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX
2025
64 cores / 128 threads, 350 Watt
89.41
+16156%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX outperforms Atom x5-E8000 by a whopping 16156% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking30155
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data6.39
Market segmentLaptopServer
Series5x Intel Atomno data
Power efficiency4.5510.73
DesignerIntelAMD
Manufacturerno dataTSMC
Architecture codenameCherry Trail (2015−2016)Shimada Peak (2025)
Release date8 February 2016 (9 years ago)23 July 2025 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)$39$7,999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Atom x5-E8000 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads4128
Base clock speedno data3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed1.04 GHz5.4 GHz
Multiplier10no data
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm4 nm
Die sizeno data8x 70.6 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data66,520 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Atom x5-E8000 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
Socketno datasTR5
Power consumption (TDP)5 Watt350 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom x5-E8000 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom x5-E8000 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom x5-E8000 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5
Maximum memory size8 GBno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) (320 MHz)N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom x5-E8000 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanes4136

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Atom x5-E8000 0.55
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX 89.41
+16156%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Atom x5-E8000 953
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX 156305
+16301%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.55 89.41
Recency 8 February 2016 23 July 2025
Physical cores 4 64
Threads 4 128
Chip lithography 14 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 5 Watt 350 Watt

Atom x5-E8000 has 6900% lower power consumption.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX, on the other hand, has a 16156.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, 1500% more physical cores and 3100% more threads, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

The AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Atom x5-E8000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Atom x5-E8000 is a notebook processor while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom x5-E8000
Atom x5-E8000
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 61 votes

Rate Atom x5-E8000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Atom x5-E8000 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.