Ryzen 3 8300G vs Atom x3-3205RK

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

Comparing Atom x3-3205RK and Ryzen 3 8300G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
Architecture codenameSilvermontPhoenix2
Release date2 March 2015 (9 years ago)8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

Atom x3-3205RK and Ryzen 3 8300G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads48
Base clock speedno data3.4 GHz
Boost clock speed1.2 GHz4.9 GHz
L1 cache56K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm4 nm
Die sizeno data137 mm2
Number of transistorsno data20,900 million
64 bit support++
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Atom x3-3205RK and Ryzen 3 8300G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socketno dataAM5
Power consumption (TDP)2 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom x3-3205RK and Ryzen 3 8300G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVXno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data

Security technologies

Atom x3-3205RK and Ryzen 3 8300G technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom x3-3205RK and Ryzen 3 8300G are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom x3-3205RK and Ryzen 3 8300G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2, DDR31333 MHz Single-channelDDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardMali-450 MP4AMD Radeon 740M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom x3-3205RK and Ryzen 3 8300G.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data14

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 March 2015 8 January 2024
Threads 4 8
Chip lithography 28 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 2 Watt 65 Watt

We couldn't decide between Atom x3-3205RK and Ryzen 3 8300G. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Atom x3-3205RK is a notebook processor while Ryzen 3 8300G is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom x3-3205RK and Ryzen 3 8300G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom x3-3205RK
Atom x3-3205RK
AMD Ryzen 3 8300G
Ryzen 3 8300G

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate Atom x3-3205RK on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 7 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 8300G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom x3-3205RK or Ryzen 3 8300G, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.