Celeron N5105 vs Atom Z670

VS

Primary details

Comparing Atom Z670 and Celeron N5105 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated1731
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Atomno data
Power efficiencyno data24.16
Architecture codenameLincroft (2010−2011)Jasper Lake (2021)
Release date11 April 2011 (13 years ago)11 January 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$75no data

Detailed specifications

Atom Z670 and Celeron N5105 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speed1.5 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed1.5 GHz2.9 GHz
Bus typecDMIno data
Bus rate400 MT/sno data
Multiplier8no data
L1 cache56 KBno data
L2 cache512K (per core)1.5 MB
L3 cache0 KB4 MB
Chip lithography45 nm10 nm
Die size65 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature90 °C105 °C
Number of transistors140 millionno data
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Atom Z670 and Celeron N5105 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketT-PBGA518FCBGA1338
Power consumption (TDP)3 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom Z670 and Celeron N5105. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Smart Responseno data-
GPIOno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-

Security technologies

Atom Z670 and Celeron N5105 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDB+no data
Identity Protection-+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom Z670 and Celeron N5105 are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x-+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom Z670 and Celeron N5105. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2DDR4
Maximum memory size2.93 GB16 GB
Max memory channels12
Maximum memory bandwidth3.2 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardPowerVR SGX535Intel UHD Graphics
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequencyno data800 MHz
Execution Unitsno data24

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Atom Z670 and Celeron N5105 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
LVDS+no data
MIPI-DSIno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Atom Z670 and Celeron N5105 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data4096x2160@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Atom Z670 and Celeron N5105 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom Z670 and Celeron N5105.

PCI Express lanesno data8
PCI support-no data
USB revisionno data2.0/3.2
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data14
Integrated LANno data-
UARTno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom Z670 158
Celeron N5105 4054
+2466%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 April 2011 11 January 2021
Physical cores 1 4
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 45 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 3 Watt 10 Watt

Atom Z670 has 233.3% lower power consumption.

Celeron N5105, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, 300% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 350% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Atom Z670 and Celeron N5105. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Atom Z670 is a notebook processor while Celeron N5105 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom Z670 and Celeron N5105, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom Z670
Atom Z670
Intel Celeron N5105
Celeron N5105

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate Atom Z670 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 691 vote

Rate Celeron N5105 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom Z670 or Celeron N5105, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.