Celeron G6900E vs Atom Z620
Primary details
Comparing Atom Z620 and Celeron G6900E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
Series | Intel Atom | no data |
Architecture codename | Lincroft (2010−2011) | Alder Lake-S (2022) |
Release date | 4 May 2010 (14 years ago) | 4 January 2022 (2 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Atom Z620 and Celeron G6900E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 2 | 2 |
Base clock speed | 0.9 GHz | 3 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 900 MHz - 1600 MHz (1 core) | 3 GHz |
Bus type | cDMI | no data |
Bus rate | 400 MT/s | no data |
Multiplier | 9 | no data |
L1 cache | 56 KB | 80K (per core) |
L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |
L3 cache | 0 KB | 4 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 10 nm |
Die size | 65.2526 mm2 | no data |
Number of transistors | 140 million | no data |
64 bit support | - | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Atom Z620 and Celeron G6900E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
Socket | Intel BGA 518 | 1700 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 1.3 Watt | 46 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom Z620 and Celeron G6900E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
AES-NI | - | + |
AVX | - | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
TSX | - | + |
Security technologies
Atom Z620 and Celeron G6900E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom Z620 and Celeron G6900E are enumerated here.
VT-d | no data | + |
VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom Z620 and Celeron G6900E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2 | DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 1 | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 3.2 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | PowerVR SGX535 | Intel UHD Graphics 710 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom Z620 and Celeron G6900E.
PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 4 May 2010 | 4 January 2022 |
Physical cores | 1 | 2 |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 10 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 1 Watt | 46 Watt |
Atom Z620 has 4500% lower power consumption.
Celeron G6900E, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, 100% more physical cores, and a 350% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Atom Z620 and Celeron G6900E. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Atom Z620 is a notebook processor while Celeron G6900E is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Atom Z620 and Celeron G6900E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.