Mobile Athlon 64 4000+ vs Atom Z520
Aggregate performance score
Mobile Athlon 64 4000+ outperforms Atom Z520 by a whopping 157% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3713 | 3555 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Atom | Mobile Athlon 64 |
| Power efficiency | 1.48 | 0.12 |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Architecture codename | Silverthorne (2008−2010) | Newark (2003) |
| Release date | 2 April 2008 (17 years ago) | no data |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $65 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Atom Z520 and Mobile Athlon 64 4000+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 1.33 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 0.03 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| Bus type | FSB | no data |
| Bus rate | 533.33 MT/s | 800 MHz |
| Multiplier | 10 | no data |
| L1 cache | 56 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | no data |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 90 nm |
| Die size | 24.18 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 90 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 47 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | 0.75-1.1V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Atom Z520 and Mobile Athlon 64 4000+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | no data |
| Socket | PBGA441 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 2 Watt | 62 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom Z520 and Mobile Athlon 64 4000+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3 | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Demand Based Switching | + | no data |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
Security technologies
Atom Z520 and Mobile Athlon 64 4000+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom Z520 and Mobile Athlon 64 4000+ are enumerated here.
| VT-d | - | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.07 | 0.18 |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 2 Watt | 62 Watt |
Atom Z520 has 100% more threads, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 3000% lower power consumption.
Mobile Athlon 64 4000+, on the other hand, has a 157.1% higher aggregate performance score.
The AMD Mobile Athlon 64 4000+ is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Atom Z520 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
