E1 Micro-6200T vs Atom Z520

VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom Z520
2008
1 core / 2 threads, 2 Watt
0.08
E1 Micro-6200T
2014
2 cores / 2 threads, 3 Watt
0.38
+375%

E1 Micro-6200T outperforms Atom Z520 by a whopping 375% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Atom Z520 and E1 Micro-6200T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking34023030
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel AtomAMD E-Series
Power efficiency3.799.11
Architecture codenameSilverthorne (2008−2010)Mullins (2014)
Release date2 April 2008 (16 years ago)29 April 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$65no data

Detailed specifications

Atom Z520 and E1 Micro-6200T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed1.33 GHz1 GHz
Boost clock speed0.03 GHz1.4 GHz
Bus typeFSBno data
Bus rate533.33 MT/sno data
Multiplier10no data
L1 cache56 KBno data
L2 cache512 KB1024 KB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography45 nm28 nm
Die size24.18 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors47 Millionno data
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.75-1.1Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Atom Z520 and E1 Micro-6200T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketPBGA441FT3b
Power consumption (TDP)2 Watt3.95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom Z520 and E1 Micro-6200T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE386x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX
AES-NI-+
FMA-FMA4
AVX-+
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
VirusProtect-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching+no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Atom Z520 and E1 Micro-6200T technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom Z520 and E1 Micro-6200T are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom Z520 and E1 Micro-6200T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3
Max memory channelsno data1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-AMD Radeon R2 Graphics
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Atom Z520 and E1 Micro-6200T integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Atom Z520 and E1 Micro-6200T integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX-DirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom Z520 and E1 Micro-6200T.

PCIe versionno data2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Atom Z520 0.08
E1 Micro-6200T 0.38
+375%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom Z520 122
E1 Micro-6200T 600
+392%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.08 0.38
Recency 2 April 2008 29 April 2014
Physical cores 1 2
Chip lithography 45 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 2 Watt 3 Watt

Atom Z520 has 50% lower power consumption.

E1 Micro-6200T, on the other hand, has a 375% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, 100% more physical cores, and a 60.7% more advanced lithography process.

The E1 Micro-6200T is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom Z520 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom Z520 and E1 Micro-6200T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom Z520
Atom Z520
AMD E1 Micro-6200T
E1 Micro-6200T

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 27 votes

Rate Atom Z520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.2 29 votes

Rate E1 Micro-6200T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom Z520 or E1 Micro-6200T, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.