Celeron M 925 vs Atom Z520

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Atom Z520 and Celeron M 925 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel AtomIntel Celeron M
Architecture codenameSilverthorne (2008−2010)Penryn (2008−2011)
Release date2 April 2008 (16 years ago)1 January 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$65$70
Current price$217 (3.3x MSRP)$51 (0.7x MSRP)

Detailed specifications

Atom Z520 and Celeron M 925 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Base clock speed1.33 GHzno data
Boost clock speed0.03 GHz2.3 GHz
Bus support533.33 MT/s800 MHz
L1 cache56 KBno data
L2 cache512 KB1 MB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
Die size24.18 mm27.8 mm × 3.1 mm107 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors47 Million410 Million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo
VID voltage range0.75-1.1Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Atom Z520 and Celeron M 925 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketPBGA441PGA478
Power consumption (TDP)2 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom Z520 and Celeron M 925. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
FSB parity-no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Atom Z520 and Celeron M 925 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom Z520 and Celeron M 925 are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 April 2008 1 January 2011
Threads 2 1
Cost $65 $70
Power consumption (TDP) 2 Watt 35 Watt

We couldn't decide between Atom Z520 and Celeron M 925. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom Z520 and Celeron M 925, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom Z520
Atom Z520
Intel Celeron M 925
Celeron M 925

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 25 votes

Rate Atom Z520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.6 7 votes

Rate Celeron M 925 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom Z520 or Celeron M 925, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.