Celeron N2940 vs Atom Z500

VS

Primary details

Comparing Atom Z500 and Celeron N2940 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated2737
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel AtomIntel Celeron
Power efficiencyno data8.86
Architecture codenameSilverthorne (2008−2010)Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
Release date2 April 2008 (16 years ago)22 May 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$45no data

Detailed specifications

Atom Z500 and Celeron N2940 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads14
Base clock speedno data1.83 GHz
Boost clock speed0.8 GHz2.25 GHz
Bus typeFSBno data
Bus rate400 MT/sno data
Multiplier8no data
L1 cache56 KB56K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm22 nm
Die size24.18 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature90 °C100 °C
Number of transistors47 Millionno data
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.80 -1.1Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Atom Z500 and Celeron N2940 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketPBGA441FCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)0.65 Watt7.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom Z500 and Celeron N2940. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching+no data
Smart Connectno data+
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Atom Z500 and Celeron N2940 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom Z500 and Celeron N2940 are enumerated here.

VT-d--
VT-x-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom Z500 and Celeron N2940. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data8 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data21.32 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-Intel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Series
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video HD--
Graphics max frequency-854 MHz
InTru 3D--

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Atom Z500 and Celeron N2940 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported-2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom Z500 and Celeron N2940.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data4
USB revisionno data3.0 and 2.0
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Atom Z500 115
Celeron N2940 29.2
+294%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 April 2008 22 May 2014
Physical cores 1 4
Threads 1 4
Chip lithography 45 nm 22 nm

Celeron N2940 has an age advantage of 6 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 104.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Atom Z500 and Celeron N2940. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom Z500 and Celeron N2940, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom Z500
Atom Z500
Intel Celeron N2940
Celeron N2940

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1.8 29 votes

Rate Atom Z500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 99 votes

Rate Celeron N2940 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom Z500 or Celeron N2940, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.