Atom N2850 vs Z520

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Atom Z520 and Atom N2850 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel AtomIntel Atom
Architecture codenameSilverthorne (2008−2010)Cedarview-M (2011−2012)
Release date2 April 2008 (16 years ago)5 January 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$65no data
Current price$217 (3.3x MSRP)no data

Detailed specifications

Atom Z520 and Atom N2850 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads24
Boost clock speed0.03 GHz2 GHz
Bus support533.33 MT/sno data
L1 cache56 KBno data
L2 cache512 KB1 MB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography45 nm32 nm
Die size24.18 mm27.8 mm × 3.1 mmno data
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors47 Millionno data
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Atom Z520 and Atom N2850 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketPBGA441no data
Power consumption (TDP)2 Watt6,6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom Z520 and Atom N2850. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom Z520 and Atom N2850 are enumerated here.

VT-x+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 April 2008 5 January 2012
Physical cores 1 2
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 45 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 2 Watt 6 Watt

Atom Z520 has 200% lower power consumption.

Atom N2850, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Atom Z520 and Atom N2850. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom Z520 and Atom N2850, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom Z520
Atom Z520
Intel Atom N2850
Atom N2850

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 25 votes

Rate Atom Z520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 3 votes

Rate Atom N2850 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom Z520 or Atom N2850, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.