Ryzen Threadripper 3990X vs Atom Z2760
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X outperforms Atom Z2760 by a whopping 26676% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3555 | 67 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 45 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 9.89 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | no data | AMD Ryzen Threadripper |
| Power efficiency | 2.40 | 6.88 |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Manufacturer | Intel | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Cloverview (2012) | Matisse (2019−2020) |
| Release date | 27 September 2012 (13 years ago) | 7 February 2020 (5 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $3,999 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Atom Z2760 and Ryzen Threadripper 3990X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 128 |
| Base clock speed | 1.8 GHz | 2.9 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.8 GHz | 4.3 GHz |
| Multiplier | no data | 29 |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 96K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 256 MB |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Die size | 65 mm2 | 74 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 95 °C |
| Number of transistors | 140 million | 3,800 million |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Atom Z2760 and Ryzen Threadripper 3990X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FC-MB4760 | TR4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 3 Watt | 280 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom Z2760 and Ryzen Threadripper 3990X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom Z2760 and Ryzen Threadripper 3990X are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-x | - | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom Z2760 and Ryzen Threadripper 3990X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR2 | DDR4-3200 |
| Maximum memory size | 2.4 GB | 256 GB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 4 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 6.4 GB/s | 102.403 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | PowerVR SGX545 (533 MHz) | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom Z2760 and Ryzen Threadripper 3990X.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.17 | 45.52 |
| Recency | 27 September 2012 | 7 February 2020 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 64 |
| Threads | 4 | 128 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 3 Watt | 280 Watt |
Atom Z2760 has 9233.3% lower power consumption.
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X, on the other hand, has a 26676.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, 3100% more physical cores and 3100% more threads, and a 357.1% more advanced lithography process.
The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Atom Z2760 in performance tests.
Be aware that Atom Z2760 is a notebook processor while Ryzen Threadripper 3990X is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
