Core i3-1215U vs Atom Z2760

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Atom Z2760 and Core i3-1215U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot rated937
Place by popularitynot in top-10020
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Alder Lake-M
Architecture codenameCloverview (2012)Alder Lake-U (2022)
Release date27 September 2012 (11 years ago)23 February 2022 (2 years ago)
Current price$481 no data

Detailed specifications

Atom Z2760 and Core i3-1215U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads48
Base clock speed1.8 GHz1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed1.8 GHz4.4 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)80K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB10 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size65 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors140 millionno data
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Atom Z2760 and Core i3-1215U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFC-MB4760FCBGA1744
Power consumption (TDP)3 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom Z2760 and Core i3-1215U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NIno data+
FMAno data+
AVXno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSXno data+
Thermal Monitoringno data+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
StatusDiscontinuedLaunched

Security technologies

Atom Z2760 and Core i3-1215U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom Z2760 and Core i3-1215U are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x-+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom Z2760 and Core i3-1215U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2DDR4, DDR5
Maximum memory size2.4 GB64 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth6.4 GB/sno data
ECC memory support--

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardPowerVR SGX545 (533 MHz)Intel® UHD Graphics for 12th Gen Intel® Processors
Quick Sync Videono data+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.1 GHz
Execution Unitsno data64

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Atom Z2760 and Core i3-1215U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data4

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Atom Z2760 and Core i3-1215U integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2304 @ 60Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096 x 2304 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Atom Z2760 and Core i3-1215U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12.1
OpenGLno data4.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom Z2760 and Core i3-1215U.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Atom Z2760 298
i3-1215U 10981
+3585%

Core i3-1215U outperforms Atom Z2760 by 3585% in Passmark.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Atom Z2760 602
i3-1215U 7879
+1210%

Core i3-1215U outperforms Atom Z2760 by 1210% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Atom Z2760 1697
i3-1215U 19430
+1045%

Core i3-1215U outperforms Atom Z2760 by 1045% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

Atom Z2760 58.13
i3-1215U 3.41
+1605%

Atom Z2760 outperforms Core i3-1215U by 1605% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Atom Z2760 1
i3-1215U 11
+1974%

Core i3-1215U outperforms Atom Z2760 by 1974% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Atom Z2760 0.18
i3-1215U 2.79
+1450%

Core i3-1215U outperforms Atom Z2760 by 1450% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Atom Z2760 0.1
i3-1215U 11.6
+19233%

Core i3-1215U outperforms Atom Z2760 by 19233% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Atom Z2760 713
i3-1215U 7944
+1014%

Core i3-1215U outperforms Atom Z2760 by 1014% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Atom Z2760 3
i3-1215U 50
+1426%

Core i3-1215U outperforms Atom Z2760 by 1426% in x264 encoding pass 2.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Atom Z2760 18
i3-1215U 199
+1023%

Core i3-1215U outperforms Atom Z2760 by 1023% in x264 encoding pass 1.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 September 2012 23 February 2022
Physical cores 2 6
Threads 4 8
Power consumption (TDP) 3 Watt 15 Watt

We couldn't decide between Atom Z2760 and Core i3-1215U. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom Z2760 and Core i3-1215U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom Z2760
Atom Z2760
Intel Core i3-1215U
Core i3-1215U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 13 votes

Rate Atom Z2760 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 2163 votes

Rate Core i3-1215U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom Z2760 or Core i3-1215U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.