Xeon D-2712T vs Atom Z2560
Aggregate performance score
Xeon D-2712T outperforms Atom Z2560 by a whopping 2076% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3500 | 1500 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 7.35 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Power efficiency | 2.95 | 2.97 |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Clovertrail (2013) | Ice Lake-D (2022−2023) |
| Release date | 27 February 2013 (13 years ago) | 24 February 2022 (4 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $349 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Atom Z2560 and Xeon D-2712T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Performance-cores | no data | 4 |
| Threads | 4 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 1.9 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 3 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 15 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 65 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 90 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 140 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Atom Z2560 and Xeon D-2712T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FC-MB4760 | FCBGA2579 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 3 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom Z2560 and Xeon D-2712T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3 | Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| QuickAssist | no data | - |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | + |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | + |
| PAE | 32 Bit | no data |
| Smart Idle | + | no data |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Atom Z2560 and Xeon D-2712T technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
| SGX | no data | Yes with Intel® SPS |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom Z2560 and Xeon D-2712T are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom Z2560 and Xeon D-2712T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR2 | DDR4 |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB | 1 TB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 4 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 8.5 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | PowerVR SGX544MP2 (400 MHz) | N/A |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Atom Z2560 and Xeon D-2712T integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | 2 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom Z2560 and Xeon D-2712T.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 32 |
| USB revision | 2.0 OTG, USB-SPH 2.0 | 3.0 |
| Total number of SATA ports | no data | 24 |
| Number of USB ports | 2 | 4 |
| Integrated LAN | no data | + |
| UART | 3 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.21 | 4.57 |
| Recency | 27 February 2013 | 24 February 2022 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 4 |
| Threads | 4 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 3 Watt | 65 Watt |
Atom Z2560 has 2067% lower power consumption.
Xeon D-2712T, on the other hand, has a 2076% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 220% more advanced lithography process.
The Intel Xeon D-2712T is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Atom Z2560 in performance tests.
Be aware that Atom Z2560 is a notebook processor while Xeon D-2712T is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
