Celeron B800 vs Atom Z2560

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom Z2560
2013
2 cores / 4 threads, 3 Watt
0.21
Celeron B800
2011, $80
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.40
+90.5%

Celeron B800 outperforms Atom Z2560 by an impressive 90% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking34953277
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron
Power efficiency2.960.48
DesignerIntelIntel
ManufacturerIntelIntel
Architecture codenameClovertrail (2013)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release date27 February 2013 (12 years ago)19 June 2011 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$80

Detailed specifications

Atom Z2560 and Celeron B800 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speedno data1.5 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz1.5 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 2.0
Bus rateno data4 × 5 GT/s
Multiplierno data15
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size65 mm2131 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C100 °C
Number of transistors140 million504 million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Atom Z2560 and Celeron B800 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFC-MB4760FCPGA988
Power consumption (TDP)3 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom Z2560 and Celeron B800. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
FMA-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAE32 Bitno data
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+
Smart Idle+no data

Security technologies

Atom Z2560 and Celeron B800 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom Z2560 and Celeron B800 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data-
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom Z2560 and Celeron B800. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2DDR3
Maximum memory size2 GB16 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth8.5 GB/s21.335 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardPowerVR SGX544MP2 (400 MHz)Intel HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel Processors
Graphics max frequencyno data1 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Atom Z2560 and Celeron B800 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported22
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
SDVOno data+
CRTno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom Z2560 and Celeron B800.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data16
USB revision2.0 OTG, USB-SPH 2.0no data
Number of USB ports2no data
UART3no data

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.21 0.40
Recency 27 February 2013 19 June 2011
Threads 4 2
Power consumption (TDP) 3 Watt 35 Watt

Atom Z2560 has an age advantage of 1 year, 100% more threads, and 1066.7% lower power consumption.

Celeron B800, on the other hand, has a 90.5% higher aggregate performance score.

The Intel Celeron B800 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Atom Z2560 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom Z2560
Atom Z2560
Intel Celeron B800
Celeron B800

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.8 11 votes

Rate Atom Z2560 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 224 votes

Rate Celeron B800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Atom Z2560 and Celeron B800, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.