Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G vs Atom N550

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Atom N550 and Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot rated693
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data34.45
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel AtomAMD Ryzen 5
Architecture codenamePineview (2009−2011)Renoir (2020−2022)
Release date23 August 2010 (13 years ago)21 July 2020 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$86no data
Current price$198 (2.3x MSRP)$180

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Atom N550 and Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads412
Base clock speed1.5 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed1.5 GHz4.2 GHz
Bus support666 MHzno data
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm7 nm
Die size87 mm2156 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data95 °C
Number of transistors176 million9800 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Atom N550 and Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA559AM4
Power consumption (TDP)8.5 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom N550 and Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3no data
AES-NIno data+
AVXno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Atom N550 and Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom N550 and Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d-no data
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom N550 and Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size2 GB128 GB
Max memory channels1no data
Maximum memory bandwidthno data51.196 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel GMA 3150AMD Radeon Vega 7

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom N550 and Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G.

PCIe versionno data4.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Atom N550 283
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G 16186
+5619%

Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G outperforms Atom N550 by 5619% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Atom N550 64
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G 1554
+2328%

Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G outperforms Atom N550 by 2328% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Atom N550 141
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G 6155
+4265%

Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G outperforms Atom N550 by 4265% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 August 2010 21 July 2020
Physical cores 2 6
Threads 4 12
Chip lithography 45 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 8 Watt 65 Watt

We couldn't decide between Atom N550 and Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Atom N550 is a notebook processor while Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom N550 and Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom N550
Atom N550
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 40 votes

Rate Atom N550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 1519 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom N550 or Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.