PRO A12-9830B vs Atom N475

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Atom N475 and PRO A12-9830B processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3370not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel AtomAMD Bristol Ridge
Power efficiency1.49no data
Architecture codenamePineview (2009−2011)Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date1 June 2010 (14 years ago)1 June 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$75no data

Detailed specifications

Atom N475 and PRO A12-9830B basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speed1.83 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed1.83 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus rate533 MHzno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache512K (per core)2048 KB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography45 nm28 nm
Die size66 mm2250 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C90 °C
Number of transistors123 million3100 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Atom N475 and PRO A12-9830B compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCBGA559FP4
Power consumption (TDP)6.5 Watt25-45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom N475 and PRO A12-9830B. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3no data
AES-NI-+
FMA-FMA4
AVX-AVX
FRTC-+
FreeSync-+
PowerTune-+
TrueAudio-+
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
Out-of-band client management-+
VirusProtect-+
RAID-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data

Security technologies

Atom N475 and PRO A12-9830B technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom N475 and PRO A12-9830B are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x-no data
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom N475 and PRO A12-9830B. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3, DDR4
Maximum memory size2 GBno data
Max memory channels12

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel GMA 3150AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
iGPU core countno data8
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Atom N475 and PRO A12-9830B integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Atom N475 and PRO A12-9830B integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom N475 and PRO A12-9830B.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data8

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 June 2010 1 June 2016
Physical cores 1 4
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 45 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 25 Watt

Atom N475 has 316.7% lower power consumption.

PRO A12-9830B, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, 300% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 60.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Atom N475 and PRO A12-9830B. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom N475 and PRO A12-9830B, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom N475
Atom N475
AMD PRO A12-9830B
PRO A12-9830B

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2 2 votes

Rate Atom N475 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 1 vote

Rate PRO A12-9830B on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom N475 or PRO A12-9830B, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.