Celeron N4500 vs Atom N470

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom N470
2010
1 core / 2 threads, 6 Watt
0.14
Celeron N4500
2021
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
1.24
+786%

Celeron N4500 outperforms Atom N470 by a whopping 786% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Atom N470 and Celeron N4500 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking33332318
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Atomno data
Power efficiency1.8919.56
Architecture codenamePineview (2009−2011)Jasper Lake (2021)
Release date1 March 2010 (14 years ago)11 January 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$75no data

Detailed specifications

Atom N470 and Celeron N4500 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed1.83 GHz1.1 GHz
Boost clock speed1.83 GHz2.8 GHz
Bus rate533 MHzno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache512K (per core)1.5 MB
L3 cache0 KB4 MB
Chip lithography45 nm10 nm
Die size66 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C105 °C
Number of transistors123 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Atom N470 and Celeron N4500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA559BGA1338
Power consumption (TDP)6.5 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom N470 and Celeron N4500. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI-+
vProno data-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring++
Smart Responseno data-
Demand Based Switching-no data
GPIOno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-

Security technologies

Atom N470 and Celeron N4500 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB+no data
Identity Protection-+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom N470 and Celeron N4500 are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x-+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom N470 and Celeron N4500. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2DDR4
Maximum memory size2 GB16 GB
Max memory channels12

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel GMA 3150Intel UHD Graphics
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequencyno data750 MHz
Execution Unitsno data16

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Atom N470 and Celeron N4500 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
MIPI-DSIno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Atom N470 and Celeron N4500 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data4096x2160@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Atom N470 and Celeron N4500 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom N470 and Celeron N4500.

PCI Express lanesno data8
USB revisionno data2.0/3.2
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data14
Integrated LANno data-
UARTno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Atom N470 0.14
Celeron N4500 1.24
+786%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom N470 224
Celeron N4500 1965
+777%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Atom N470 538
Celeron N4500 2053
+282%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Atom N470 106.7
Celeron N4500 50.2
+113%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.14 1.24
Integrated graphics card 0.01 5.58
Recency 1 March 2010 11 January 2021
Physical cores 1 2
Chip lithography 45 nm 10 nm

Celeron N4500 has a 785.7% higher aggregate performance score, 55700% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 10 years, 100% more physical cores, and a 350% more advanced lithography process.

The Celeron N4500 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom N470 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom N470 and Celeron N4500, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom N470
Atom N470
Intel Celeron N4500
Celeron N4500

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 37 votes

Rate Atom N470 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 744 votes

Rate Celeron N4500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom N470 or Celeron N4500, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.