Ryzen 3 3200G vs A10-7890K

Aggregate performance score

A10-7890K
2016
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
2.31
Ryzen 3 3200G
2019
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
4.66
+102%

Ryzen 3 3200G outperforms A10-7890K by a whopping 102% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A10-7890K and Ryzen 3 3200G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking18261311
Place by popularitynot in top-10029
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.338.90
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Seriesno dataAMD Ryzen 3
Power efficiency2.226.54
Architecture codenameGodaveri (2014−2016)Picasso (2019−2022)
Release date11 January 2016 (8 years ago)12 June 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$150$99

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 3 3200G has 2597% better value for money than A10-7890K.

Detailed specifications

A10-7890K and Ryzen 3 3200G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed4 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed4.3 GHz4 GHz
Bus typeno dataPCIe 3.0
Multiplierno data36
L1 cache256 KB384 KB
L2 cache4096 KB2 MB
L3 cache0 KB4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm12 nm
Die size246 mm2209.78 mm2
Maximum core temperature72 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 million4940 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier++

Compatibility

Information on A10-7890K and Ryzen 3 3200G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFM2+AM4
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-7890K and Ryzen 3 3200G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMAFMA4-
AVXAVX+
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
Out-of-band client management+-
VirusProtect+-
HSA+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-7890K and Ryzen 3 3200G are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-7890K and Ryzen 3 3200G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-2133DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidthno data46.933 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R7 GraphicsAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
iGPU core count8no data
Number of pipelines512no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A10-7890K and Ryzen 3 3200G integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A10-7890K and Ryzen 3 3200G integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-7890K and Ryzen 3 3200G.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A10-7890K 2.31
Ryzen 3 3200G 4.66
+102%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A10-7890K 3533
Ryzen 3 3200G 7129
+102%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.31 4.66
Recency 11 January 2016 12 June 2019
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 65 Watt

Ryzen 3 3200G has a 101.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 46.2% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 3 3200G is our recommended choice as it beats the A10-7890K in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A10-7890K and Ryzen 3 3200G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10-7890K
A10-7890K
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
Ryzen 3 3200G

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 123 votes

Rate A10-7890K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 3090 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 3200G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A10-7890K or Ryzen 3 3200G, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.