EPYC 9654 vs Atom N455

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Atom N455 and EPYC 9654 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot rated4
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data10.11
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel AtomAMD EPYC
Architecture codenamePinetrail (2009−2010)Genoa
Release date1 June 2010 (13 years ago)10 November 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$64$11,805
Current price$163 (2.5x MSRP)$4544 (0.4x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Atom N455 and EPYC 9654 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)96
Threads2192
Base clock speed1.66 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed1.67 GHz2.4 GHz
Bus support533 MHzno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)6 MB
L2 cache512K (per core)96 MB
L3 cache0 KB384 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die size66 mm212x 72 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors123 million78,840 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Atom N455 and EPYC 9654 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCBGA559SP5
Power consumption (TDP)6.5 Watt360 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom N455 and EPYC 9654. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3no data
AES-NIno data+
AVXno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Atom N455 and EPYC 9654 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom N455 and EPYC 9654 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d-no data
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom N455 and EPYC 9654. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size2 GB6 TiB
Max memory channels1no data
Maximum memory bandwidthno data460.8 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel GMA 3150no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom N455 and EPYC 9654.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Atom N455 193
EPYC 9654 122155
+63193%

EPYC 9654 outperforms Atom N455 by 63193% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Atom N455 72
EPYC 9654 1831
+2443%

EPYC 9654 outperforms Atom N455 by 2443% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Atom N455 121
EPYC 9654 18730
+15379%

EPYC 9654 outperforms Atom N455 by 15379% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 June 2010 10 November 2022
Physical cores 1 96
Threads 2 192
Cost $64 $11805
Chip lithography 45 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 360 Watt

We couldn't decide between Atom N455 and EPYC 9654. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Atom N455 is a notebook processor while EPYC 9654 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom N455 and EPYC 9654, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom N455
Atom N455
AMD EPYC 9654
EPYC 9654

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 211 votes

Rate Atom N455 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 982 votes

Rate EPYC 9654 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom N455 or EPYC 9654, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.