Ryzen 5 3400G vs Atom N2800

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Atom N2800 and Ryzen 5 3400G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated1108
Place by popularitynot in top-10092
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel AtomAMD Ryzen 5
Power efficiencyno data8.49
Architecture codenameCedarview-M (2011−2012)Picasso (2019−2022)
Release date1 December 2011 (12 years ago)12 June 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$47no data

Detailed specifications

Atom N2800 and Ryzen 5 3400G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads48
Base clock speed1.86 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed1.87 GHz4.2 GHz
Bus typeno dataPCIe 3.0
Multiplierno data37
L1 cache64 KB (per core)384 KB
L2 cache512K (per core)2 MB
L3 cache0 KB4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm12 nm
Die size66 mm2210 mm2
Number of transistors176 million4940 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Atom N2800 and Ryzen 5 3400G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA559AM4
Power consumption (TDP)6.5 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom N2800 and Ryzen 5 3400G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3no data
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data

Security technologies

Atom N2800 and Ryzen 5 3400G technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom N2800 and Ryzen 5 3400G are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom N2800 and Ryzen 5 3400G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-2933
Maximum memory size4.88 GB64 GB
Max memory channels12
Maximum memory bandwidthno data46.933 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650AMD Radeon RX Vega 11

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom N2800 and Ryzen 5 3400G.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom N2800 444
Ryzen 5 3400G 9252
+1984%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 December 2011 12 June 2019
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 4 8
Chip lithography 32 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 65 Watt

Atom N2800 has 983.3% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 5 3400G, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 166.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Atom N2800 and Ryzen 5 3400G. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Atom N2800 is a notebook processor while Ryzen 5 3400G is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom N2800 and Ryzen 5 3400G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom N2800
Atom N2800
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
Ryzen 5 3400G

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 103 votes

Rate Atom N2800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 2114 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 3400G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom N2800 or Ryzen 5 3400G, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.