EPYC Embedded 3255 vs Atom N2800

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3417not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel AtomAMD EPYC Embedded
Power efficiency3.83no data
DesignerIntelAMD
ManufacturerIntelGlobalFoundries
Architecture codenameCedarview-M (2011−2012)Zen (2017−2020)
Release date1 December 2011 (14 years ago)21 February 2018 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$47no data

Detailed specifications

Atom N2800 and EPYC Embedded 3255 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads416
Base clock speed1.86 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed1.87 GHz2.5 GHz
Multiplierno data25
L1 cache64 KB (per core)768 KB
L2 cache512K (per core)4 MB
L3 cache0 KB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size66 mm2213 mm2
Number of transistors176 million4800 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Atom N2800 and EPYC Embedded 3255 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA559AMD BGA SP4r2
Power consumption (TDP)6.5 Watt55 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom N2800 and EPYC Embedded 3255. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3no data
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data

Security technologies

Atom N2800 and EPYC Embedded 3255 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom N2800 and EPYC Embedded 3255 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom N2800 and EPYC Embedded 3255. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-2666
Maximum memory size4.88 GB512 GB
Max memory channels12
Maximum memory bandwidthno data42.671 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650 (640 MHz)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom N2800 and EPYC Embedded 3255.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data32

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 December 2011 21 February 2018
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 4 16
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 55 Watt

Atom N2800 has 816.7% lower power consumption.

EPYC Embedded 3255, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Intel Atom N2800 and AMD EPYC Embedded 3255. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Atom N2800 is a notebook processor while EPYC Embedded 3255 is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom N2800
Atom N2800
AMD EPYC Embedded 3255
EPYC Embedded 3255

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 109 votes

Rate Atom N2800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC Embedded 3255 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Atom N2800 and EPYC Embedded 3255, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.