EPYC 9355 vs Atom N2800

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Atom N2800 and EPYC 9355 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3118not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Atomno data
Power efficiency3.79no data
Architecture codenameCedarview-M (2011−2012)Turin (2024)
Release date1 December 2011 (12 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$47$3,694

Detailed specifications

Atom N2800 and EPYC 9355 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads464
Base clock speed1.86 GHz3.55 GHz
Boost clock speed1.87 GHz4.4 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm4 nm
Die size66 mm28x 70.6 mm2
Number of transistors176 million66,520 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Atom N2800 and EPYC 9355 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCBGA559SP5
Power consumption (TDP)6.5 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom N2800 and EPYC 9355. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3no data
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Atom N2800 and EPYC 9355 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom N2800 and EPYC 9355 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom N2800 and EPYC 9355. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5
Maximum memory size4.88 GBno data
Max memory channels1no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650 (640 MHz)N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom N2800 and EPYC 9355.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 December 2011 10 October 2024
Physical cores 2 32
Threads 4 64
Chip lithography 32 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 280 Watt

Atom N2800 has 4566.7% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9355, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 12 years, 1500% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Atom N2800 and EPYC 9355. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Atom N2800 is a notebook processor while EPYC 9355 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom N2800 and EPYC 9355, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom N2800
Atom N2800
AMD EPYC 9355
EPYC 9355

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 104 votes

Rate Atom N2800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9355 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom N2800 or EPYC 9355, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.