i5-12400 vs Atom N2800
Aggregate performance score
Core i5-12400 outperforms Atom N2800 by a whopping 4211% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Atom N2800 and Core i5-12400 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3139 | 642 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 80 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Atom | no data |
| Power efficiency | 3.81 | 17.70 |
| Architecture codename | Cedarview-M (2011−2012) | Alder Lake-S (2022) |
| Release date | 1 December 2011 (13 years ago) | 4 January 2022 (3 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $47 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Atom N2800 and Core i5-12400 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | 1.86 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.87 GHz | 4.4 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 80K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 18 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 66 mm2 | 163 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 176 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Atom N2800 and Core i5-12400 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FCBGA559 | 1700 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6.5 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom N2800 and Core i5-12400. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3 | no data |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
| TSX | - | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
Security technologies
Atom N2800 and Core i5-12400 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | + |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom N2800 and Core i5-12400 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | - | + |
| VT-x | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom N2800 and Core i5-12400. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel |
| Maximum memory size | 4.88 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 1 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650 (640 MHz) | Intel UHD Graphics 730 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom N2800 and Core i5-12400.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 20 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.28 | 12.07 |
| Recency | 1 December 2011 | 4 January 2022 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 6 |
| Threads | 4 | 12 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 65 Watt |
Atom N2800 has 983.3% lower power consumption.
i5-12400, on the other hand, has a 4210.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and a 220% more advanced lithography process.
The Core i5-12400 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom N2800 in performance tests.
Be aware that Atom N2800 is a notebook processor while Core i5-12400 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Atom N2800 and Core i5-12400, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
