Xeon E7-8891 v3 vs Atom N2600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom N2600
2011
2 cores / 4 threads, 3 Watt
0.20
Xeon E7-8891 v3
2015
10 cores / 20 threads, 165 Watt
13.47
+6635%

Xeon E7-8891 v3 outperforms Atom N2600 by a whopping 6635% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3311588
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Atomno data
Power efficiency4.787.81
DesignerIntelIntel
ManufacturerIntelIntel
Architecture codenameCedarview-M (2011−2012)Haswell-EX (2015)
Release date1 December 2011 (13 years ago)1 June 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$47no data

Detailed specifications

Atom N2600 and Xeon E7-8891 v3 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads420
Base clock speed1.6 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz3.5 GHz
Bus rateno data9.6 GT/s
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB45 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm22 nm
Die size66 mm2160 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data79 °C
Number of transistors176 million1,400 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Atom N2600 and Xeon E7-8891 v3 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration18
SocketFCBGA559FCLGA2011
Power consumption (TDP)3.5 Watt165 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom N2600 and Xeon E7-8891 v3. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX-+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring++
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAEno data46 Bit

Security technologies

Atom N2600 and Xeon E7-8891 v3 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom N2600 and Xeon E7-8891 v3 are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x-+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom N2600 and Xeon E7-8891 v3. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-1333/1600/1866, DDR3-1066/1333/1600
Maximum memory size2.44 GB1.5 TB
Max memory channels14
Maximum memory bandwidthno data85 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600 (400 MHz)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom N2600 and Xeon E7-8891 v3.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data32

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Atom N2600 0.20
Xeon E7-8891 v3 13.47
+6635%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Atom N2600 316
Xeon E7-8891 v3 21615
+6740%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.20 13.47
Recency 1 December 2011 1 June 2015
Physical cores 2 10
Threads 4 20
Chip lithography 32 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 3 Watt 165 Watt

Atom N2600 has 5400% lower power consumption.

Xeon E7-8891 v3, on the other hand, has a 6635% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 400% more physical cores and 400% more threads, and a 45.5% more advanced lithography process.

The Intel Xeon E7-8891 v3 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Atom N2600 in performance tests.

Be aware that Atom N2600 is a notebook processor while Xeon E7-8891 v3 is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom N2600
Atom N2600
Intel Xeon E7-8891 v3
Xeon E7-8891 v3

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 195 votes

Rate Atom N2600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 3 votes

Rate Xeon E7-8891 v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Atom N2600 and Xeon E7-8891 v3, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.