Atom x7425E vs N2800
Aggregate performance score
Atom x7425E outperforms Atom N2800 by a whopping 1136% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Atom N2800 and Atom x7425E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3118 | 1536 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Atom | no data |
| Power efficiency | 3.79 | 27.29 |
| Architecture codename | Cedarview-M (2011−2012) | Gracemont (2023) |
| Release date | 1 December 2011 (12 years ago) | 3 January 2023 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $47 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Atom N2800 and Atom x7425E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 1.86 GHz | 1.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.87 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 96K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 2 MB (shared) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 6 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 66 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 176 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Atom N2800 and Atom x7425E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FCBGA559 | Intel BGA 1744 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6.5 Watt | 12 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom N2800 and Atom x7425E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3 | no data |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
Security technologies
Atom N2800 and Atom x7425E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | + |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom N2800 and Atom x7425E are enumerated here.
| VT-d | - | + |
| VT-x | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom N2800 and Atom x7425E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channel |
| Maximum memory size | 4.88 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 1 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650 (640 MHz) | Intel UHD Graphics 24EU |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom N2800 and Atom x7425E.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 9 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.28 | 3.46 |
| Recency | 1 December 2011 | 3 January 2023 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 12 Watt |
Atom N2800 has 100% lower power consumption.
Atom x7425E, on the other hand, has a 1135.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, 100% more physical cores, and a 220% more advanced lithography process.
The Atom x7425E is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom N2800 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Atom N2800 and Atom x7425E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
