Xeon Bronze 3508U vs Atom N280

VS

Primary details

Comparing Atom N280 and Xeon Bronze 3508U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Atomno data
Architecture codenameDiamondVille (2008−2009)no data
Release date1 February 2009 (15 years ago)1 October 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Atom N280 and Xeon Bronze 3508U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads28
Base clock speed1.66 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed0.07 GHz2.2 GHz
Bus typeFSBno data
Bus rate666.66 MT/sno data
Multiplier10no data
L1 cache56 KBno data
L2 cache512 KBno data
L3 cache0 KB22.5 MB
Chip lithography45 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size25.9638 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature90 °C83 °C
Number of transistors47 Millionno data
64 bit support--
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
VID voltage range0.9V-1.1625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Atom N280 and Xeon Bronze 3508U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketPBGA437FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)2.5 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom N280 and Xeon Bronze 3508U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX-+
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Atom N280 and Xeon Bronze 3508U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom N280 and Xeon Bronze 3508U are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x-+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom N280 and Xeon Bronze 3508U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5 @ 4400 MT/s (1 DPC &2DPC)
Maximum memory size8 GB4 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom N280 and Xeon Bronze 3508U.

PCIe versionno data4
PCI Express lanesno data80

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 February 2009 1 October 2023
Physical cores 1 8
Threads 2 8
Power consumption (TDP) 2 Watt 125 Watt

Atom N280 has 6150% lower power consumption.

Xeon Bronze 3508U, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 14 years, and 700% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Atom N280 and Xeon Bronze 3508U. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Atom N280 is a notebook processor while Xeon Bronze 3508U is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom N280 and Xeon Bronze 3508U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom N280
Atom N280
Intel Xeon Bronze 3508U
Xeon Bronze 3508U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 30 votes

Rate Atom N280 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Xeon Bronze 3508U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom N280 or Xeon Bronze 3508U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.