Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX vs Atom N270
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX outperforms Atom N270 by a whopping 23725% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3626 | 343 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Intel Atom | AMD Ryzen Threadripper |
| Power efficiency | 1.35 | 2.87 |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Manufacturer | no data | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | DiamondVille (2008−2009) | Castle Peak (2020) |
| Release date | 2 April 2008 (17 years ago) | 14 July 2020 (5 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $44 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Atom N270 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 12 (Dodeca-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 24 |
| Base clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 0.1 GHz | 4.3 GHz |
| Bus type | FSB | no data |
| Bus rate | 533.33 MT/s | no data |
| Multiplier | 12 | 40 |
| L1 cache | 56 KB | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 64 MB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Die size | 25.9638 mm2 | 2x 74 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 90 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 95 °C |
| Number of transistors | 47 Million | 7,600 million |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| VID voltage range | 0.9V-1.1625V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Atom N270 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | PBGA437 | WRX8 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 2.5 Watt | 280 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom N270 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE, Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3 | no data |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
| Idle States | - | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
Security technologies
Atom N270 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom N270 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | - | no data |
| VT-x | - | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom N270 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4-3200 |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB | 2 TiB |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 204.8 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | - | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom N270 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 128 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.08 | 19.06 |
| Recency | 2 April 2008 | 14 July 2020 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 12 |
| Threads | 2 | 24 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 2 Watt | 280 Watt |
Atom N270 has 13900% lower power consumption.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX, on the other hand, has a 23725% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, 1100% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.
The AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Atom N270 in performance tests.
Be aware that Atom N270 is a notebook processor while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
