Core i7-9700F vs Atom N270
Primary details
Comparing Atom N270 and Core i7-9700F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | 834 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 12.90 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Atom | Intel Core i7 |
| Architecture codename | DiamondVille (2008−2009) | Coffee Lake (2017−2019) |
| Release date | 1 March 2008 (16 years ago) | 23 April 2019 (5 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $44 | $323 |
| Current price | $134 (3x MSRP) | $288 (0.9x MSRP) |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Atom N270 and Core i7-9700F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 4.7 GHz |
| Bus support | 533 MHz | 4 × 8 GT/s |
| L1 cache | 56 KB | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 256K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 12 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 26 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 90 °C | 100 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 72 °C |
| Number of transistors | 47 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
| VID voltage range | 0.9V-1.1625V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Atom N270 and Core i7-9700F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | PBGA437 | FCLGA1151 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 2.5 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom N270 and Core i7-9700F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE, Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3 | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
| AES-NI | no data | + |
| AVX | no data | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | - |
| TSX | no data | + |
| Idle States | - | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | + |
| SIPP | no data | + |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
Security technologies
Atom N270 and Core i7-9700F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | + |
| EDB | + | + |
| Secure Key | no data | + |
| MPX | no data | + |
| Identity Protection | no data | + |
| SGX | no data | Yes with Intel® ME |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom N270 and Core i7-9700F are enumerated here.
| VT-d | - | + |
| VT-x | - | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom N270 and Core i7-9700F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4-2666 |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB | 128 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 41.6 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | no data | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom N270 and Core i7-9700F.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 16 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Core i7-9700F outperforms Atom N270 by 9643% in Passmark.
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 March 2008 | 23 April 2019 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 8 |
| Threads | 2 | 8 |
| Cost | $44 | $323 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 2 Watt | 65 Watt |
We couldn't decide between Atom N270 and Core i7-9700F. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Atom N270 is a notebook processor while Core i7-9700F is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Atom N270 and Core i7-9700F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
