Ryzen 5 3500X vs Atom N2600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Atom N2600 and Ryzen 5 3500X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot rated839
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data32.73
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel AtomAMD Ryzen 5
Architecture codenameCedarview-M (2011−2012)Matisse (2019−2020)
Release date1 December 2011 (12 years ago)24 September 2019 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$47no data
Current price$251 (5.3x MSRP)$125

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Atom N2600 and Ryzen 5 3500X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads46
Base clock speed1.6 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz4.1 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB32 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm7 nm, 12 nm
Die size66 mm2no data
Number of transistors176 million4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Atom N2600 and Ryzen 5 3500X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA559AM4
Power consumption (TDP)3.5 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom N2600 and Ryzen 5 3500X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3no data
AES-NIno data+
AVXno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Atom N2600 and Ryzen 5 3500X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom N2600 and Ryzen 5 3500X are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d-no data
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom N2600 and Ryzen 5 3500X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size2.44 GB128 GB
Max memory channels12
Maximum memory bandwidthno data51.196 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Atom N2600 360
Ryzen 5 3500X 13176
+3560%

Ryzen 5 3500X outperforms Atom N2600 by 3560% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Atom N2600 75
Ryzen 5 3500X 1558
+1977%

Ryzen 5 3500X outperforms Atom N2600 by 1977% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Atom N2600 210
Ryzen 5 3500X 5871
+2696%

Ryzen 5 3500X outperforms Atom N2600 by 2696% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 December 2011 24 September 2019
Physical cores 2 6
Threads 4 6
Chip lithography 32 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 3 Watt 65 Watt

We couldn't decide between Atom N2600 and Ryzen 5 3500X. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Atom N2600 is a notebook processor while Ryzen 5 3500X is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom N2600 and Ryzen 5 3500X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom N2600
Atom N2600
AMD Ryzen 5 3500X
Ryzen 5 3500X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 171 vote

Rate Atom N2600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 1715 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 3500X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom N2600 or Ryzen 5 3500X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.