i5-13500E vs Atom N2600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom N2600
2011, $47
2 cores / 4 threads, 3 Watt
0.20
Core i5-13500E
2023
14 cores / 20 threads, 65 Watt
13.48
+6640%

Core i5-13500E outperforms Atom N2600 by a whopping 6640% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3472610
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Atomno data
Power efficiency2.128.81
DesignerIntelIntel
ManufacturerIntelIntel
Architecture codenameCedarview-M (2011−2012)Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Release date1 December 2011 (13 years ago)4 January 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$47no data

Detailed specifications

Atom N2600 and Core i5-13500E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)14 (Tetradeca-Core)
Threads420
Base clock speed1.6 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz4.6 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm10 nm
Die size66 mm2257 mm2
Number of transistors176 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Atom N2600 and Core i5-13500E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA5591700
Power consumption (TDP)3.5 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom N2600 and Core i5-13500E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3no data
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX-+
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data

Security technologies

Atom N2600 and Core i5-13500E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom N2600 and Core i5-13500E are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom N2600 and Core i5-13500E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size2.44 GBno data
Max memory channels1no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600 (400 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 770

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom N2600 and Core i5-13500E.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Atom N2600 0.20
i5-13500E 13.48
+6640%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Atom N2600 344
Samples: 146
i5-13500E 23764
+6808%
Samples: 5

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Atom N2600 75
i5-13500E 1776
+2268%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Atom N2600 210
i5-13500E 10592
+4944%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.20 13.48
Recency 1 December 2011 4 January 2023
Physical cores 2 14
Threads 4 20
Chip lithography 32 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 3 Watt 65 Watt

Atom N2600 has 2066.7% lower power consumption.

i5-13500E, on the other hand, has a 6640% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, 600% more physical cores and 400% more threads, and a 220% more advanced lithography process.

The Intel Core i5-13500E is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Atom N2600 in performance tests.

Be aware that Atom N2600 is a notebook processor while Core i5-13500E is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom N2600
Atom N2600
Intel Core i5-13500E
Core i5-13500E

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 216 votes

Rate Atom N2600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 11 votes

Rate Core i5-13500E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Atom N2600 and Core i5-13500E, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.