Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G vs Atom E680
Primary details
Comparing Atom E680 and Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | 938 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 38.04 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | no data | AMD Ryzen 3 |
| Architecture codename | Tunnel Creek (2010) | Renoir (2020−2022) |
| Release date | 14 September 2010 (13 years ago) | 21 July 2020 (3 years ago) |
| Current price | no data | $106 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Atom E680 and Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 4 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 4 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 12 nm |
| Die size | 26 mm2 | 156 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 47 million | 9800 Million |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Atom E680 and Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | Intel BGA 676 | AM4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 4 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom E680 and Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | no data | + |
| AVX | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom E680 and Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom E680 and Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR2 | DDR4-3200 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 128 GB |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 51.196 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel GMA 600 | AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom E680 and Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G outperforms Atom E680 by 3058% in Passmark.
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 14 September 2010 | 21 July 2020 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 4 |
| Threads | 2 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 12 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 4 Watt | 65 Watt |
We couldn't decide between Atom E680 and Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Atom E680 is a notebook processor while Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Atom E680 and Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
