Celeron N3000 vs Atom E3845

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Atom E3845 and Celeron N3000 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2623not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAtomIntel Celeron
Architecture codenameBay Trail-I (2013)Braswell (2015−2016)
Release date8 October 2013 (10 years ago)1 April 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$107
Current price$781 $334 (3.1x MSRP)

Detailed specifications

Atom E3845 and Celeron N3000 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speedno data1.04 GHz
Boost clock speed1.91 GHz2.08 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache512 KB (per core)2 MB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography22 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Atom E3845 and Celeron N3000 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketIntel BGA1170FCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt4 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom E3845 and Celeron N3000. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NIno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoringno data+
SIPPno data-
Smart Responseno data-
GPIOno data+
Smart Connectno data-
Statusno dataDiscontinued
HD Audiono data+
RSTno data-

Security technologies

Atom E3845 and Celeron N3000 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+
Secure Bootno data+
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protectionno data+
OS Guardno data-
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom E3845 and Celeron N3000 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data-
VT-xno data+
VT-ino data-
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom E3845 and Celeron N3000. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data8 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
ECC memory supportno data-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD GraphicsIntel® HD Graphics for Intel® Celeron® Processor N3000 Series
Max video memoryno data8 GB
Quick Sync Videono data+
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data600 MHz
Execution Unitsno data12

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Atom E3845 and Celeron N3000 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPortno data+
HDMIno data+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Atom E3845 and Celeron N3000 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data+
OpenGLno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom E3845 and Celeron N3000.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data4
USB revisionno data2.0/3.0
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data5
Integrated LANno data-
UARTno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Atom E3845 1058
+71.8%
Celeron N3000 616

Atom E3845 outperforms Celeron N3000 by 72% in Passmark.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 October 2013 1 April 2015
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 22 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 4 Watt

We couldn't decide between Atom E3845 and Celeron N3000. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom E3845 and Celeron N3000, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom E3845
Atom E3845
Intel Celeron N3000
Celeron N3000

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1.5 10 votes

Rate Atom E3845 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 20 votes

Rate Celeron N3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom E3845 or Celeron N3000, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.