Opteron 154 vs Atom E3827
Primary details
Comparing Atom E3827 and Opteron 154 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Atom | no data |
| Architecture codename | Bay Trail-I (2013) | Venus (2004−2005) |
| Release date | 8 October 2013 (10 years ago) | 2 August 2005 (18 years ago) |
| Current price | $898 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Atom E3827 and Opteron 154 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.75 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 90 nm |
| Die size | no data | 115 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 114 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Atom E3827 and Opteron 154 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | Intel BGA1170 | 939 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 8 Watt | 104 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom E3827 and Opteron 154. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom E3827 and Opteron 154. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR1 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Atom E3827 outperforms Opteron 154 by 1% in Passmark.
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 8 October 2013 | 2 August 2005 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 8 Watt | 104 Watt |
We couldn't decide between Atom E3827 and Opteron 154. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Atom E3827 is a notebook processor while Opteron 154 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Atom E3827 and Opteron 154, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
