Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS vs Atom E3826
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS outperforms Atom E3826 by a whopping 6516% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3481 | 659 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Atom | AMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040) |
| Power efficiency | 1.15 | 9.86 |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Manufacturer | Intel | no data |
| Architecture codename | Bay Trail-I (2013) | Phoenix (Zen4) (2023) |
| Release date | 8 October 2013 (12 years ago) | 5 January 2023 (2 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Atom E3826 and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 4.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.47 GHz | 5 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 384 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 6 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 16 MB |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | no data | 178 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Atom E3826 and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | Intel BGA1170 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 7 Watt | 54 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom E3826 and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom E3826 and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics | AMD Radeon 760M ( - 2600 MHz) |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.19 | 12.57 |
| Integrated graphics card | 0.68 | 12.37 |
| Recency | 8 October 2013 | 5 January 2023 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 6 |
| Threads | 2 | 12 |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 7 Watt | 54 Watt |
Atom E3826 has 671.4% lower power consumption.
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS, on the other hand, has a 6515.8% higher aggregate performance score, 1719.1% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 9 years, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 450% more advanced lithography process.
The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Atom E3826 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
