Ryzen 7 2700 vs Atom D525

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Atom D525 and Ryzen 7 2700 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot rated707
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data20.57
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel AtomAMD Ryzen 7
Architecture codenamePinetrail (2009−2010)Zen+ (2018−2020)
Release date21 June 2010 (13 years ago)19 April 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$63$299
Current price$320 (5.1x MSRP)$176 (0.6x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Atom D525 and Ryzen 7 2700 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads416
Base clock speed1.8 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed1.83 GHz4.1 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm12 nm
Die size66 mm2192 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors176 million4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Atom D525 and Ryzen 7 2700 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA559AM4
Power consumption (TDP)13 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom D525 and Ryzen 7 2700. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3SSE4.2, SSE4A, AMD-V, AES, AVX2, FMA3, SHA
AES-NI-+
AVXno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States-no data
Thermal Monitoring-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Atom D525 and Ryzen 7 2700 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom D525 and Ryzen 7 2700 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d-no data
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom D525 and Ryzen 7 2700. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2, DDR3DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size4 GB64 GB
Max memory channels12
Maximum memory bandwidth6.4 GB/s46.933 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel GMA 3150-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom D525 and Ryzen 7 2700.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Atom D525 400
Ryzen 7 2700 15708
+3827%

Ryzen 7 2700 outperforms Atom D525 by 3827% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Atom D525 76
Ryzen 7 2700 1112
+1363%

Ryzen 7 2700 outperforms Atom D525 by 1363% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Atom D525 187
Ryzen 7 2700 5486
+2834%

Ryzen 7 2700 outperforms Atom D525 by 2834% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Atom D525 610
Ryzen 7 2700 4505
+639%

Ryzen 7 2700 outperforms Atom D525 by 639% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Atom D525 1707
Ryzen 7 2700 31385
+1739%

Ryzen 7 2700 outperforms Atom D525 by 1739% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Atom D525 891
Ryzen 7 2700 9475
+963%

Ryzen 7 2700 outperforms Atom D525 by 963% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

Atom D525 55.25
Ryzen 7 2700 5.14
+975%

Atom D525 outperforms Ryzen 7 2700 by 975% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Atom D525 1
Ryzen 7 2700 17
+2832%

Ryzen 7 2700 outperforms Atom D525 by 2832% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 21 June 2010 19 April 2018
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 4 16
Cost $63 $299
Chip lithography 45 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 13 Watt 65 Watt

We couldn't decide between Atom D525 and Ryzen 7 2700. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Atom D525 is a notebook processor while Ryzen 7 2700 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom D525 and Ryzen 7 2700, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom D525
Atom D525
AMD Ryzen 7 2700
Ryzen 7 2700

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 186 votes

Rate Atom D525 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 2890 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 2700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom D525 or Ryzen 7 2700, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.