Solo T1200 vs Atom D510
Aggregate performance score
Atom D510 outperforms Core Solo T1200 by an impressive 64% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3477 | 3628 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Core Solo |
| Power efficiency | 0.75 | 0.22 |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Manufacturer | Intel | no data |
| Architecture codename | Pineview (2009−2011) | Yonah (2005−2006) |
| Release date | 21 December 2009 (16 years ago) | January 2006 (20 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $97 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of Atom D510 and Core Solo T1200: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 1.66 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 1.67 GHz | 1.5 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 667 MHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 2 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 65 nm |
| Die size | 66 mm2 | 90 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 176 million | 151 million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Atom D510 and Core Solo T1200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FCBGA559 | 479 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 13 Watt | 27 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom D510 and Core Solo T1200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3 | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | - | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
| Idle States | - | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| PAE | 32 Bit | no data |
Security technologies
Atom D510 and Core Solo T1200 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom D510 and Core Solo T1200 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | - | no data |
| VT-x | - | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom D510 and Core Solo T1200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR2 | DDR1 |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 1 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 6.4 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.23 | 0.14 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 13 Watt | 27 Watt |
Atom D510 has a 64% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 44% more advanced lithography process, and 108% lower power consumption.
The Intel Atom D510 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core Solo T1200 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
