Opteron 3380 vs Atom D425

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom D425
2010
1 core / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.11
Opteron 3380
2012
8 cores / 8 threads, 65 Watt
2.48
+2155%

Opteron 3380 outperforms Atom D425 by a whopping 2155% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking36031920
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
Power efficiency0.461.61
DesignerIntelAMD
ManufacturerIntelno data
Architecture codenamePineview (2009−2011)Delhi (2012−2013)
Release date21 June 2010 (15 years ago)4 December 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$993no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Atom D425 and Opteron 3380 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads28
Base clock speed1.8 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed1.83 GHz3.6 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)384 KB
L2 cache512 KB (per core)8192 KB
L3 cache0 KB8192 KB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm32 nm
Die size66 mm2315 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors123 million1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Atom D425 and Opteron 3380 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA559AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom D425 and Opteron 3380. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3no data
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data

Security technologies

Atom D425 and Opteron 3380 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom D425 and Opteron 3380 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom D425 and Opteron 3380. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2, DDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size4 GBno data
Max memory channels1no data
Maximum memory bandwidth6.4 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel GMA 3150no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom D425 and Opteron 3380.

PCIe versionno data2.0

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Atom D425 0.11
Opteron 3380 2.48
+2155%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Atom D425 185
Samples: 40
Opteron 3380 4358
+2256%
Samples: 5

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.11 2.48
Recency 21 June 2010 4 December 2012
Physical cores 1 8
Threads 2 8
Chip lithography 45 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 65 Watt

Atom D425 has 550% lower power consumption.

Opteron 3380, on the other hand, has a 2154.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 700% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.

The AMD Opteron 3380 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Atom D425 in performance tests.

Be aware that Atom D425 is a notebook processor while Opteron 3380 is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom D425
Atom D425
AMD Opteron  3380
Opteron 3380

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 65 votes

Rate Atom D425 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 5 votes

Rate Opteron 3380 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Atom D425 and Opteron 3380, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.