EPYC 7343 vs Atom D425

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom D425
2010, $993
1 core / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.11
EPYC 7343
2021, $1,565
16 cores / 32 threads, 190 Watt
24.94
+22573%

EPYC 7343 outperforms Atom D425 by a whopping 22573% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3687267
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data12.08
Market segmentLaptopServer
Seriesno dataAMD EPYC
Power efficiency0.465.54
DesignerIntelAMD
ManufacturerIntelTSMC
Architecture codenamePineview (2009−2011)Milan (2021−2023)
Release date21 June 2010 (15 years ago)12 January 2021 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$993$1,565

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Atom D425 and EPYC 7343 have a nearly equal value for money.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Atom D425 and EPYC 7343 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads232
Base clock speed1.8 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed1.83 GHz3.9 GHz
Multiplierno data32
L1 cache64 KB (per core)1 MB
L2 cache512 KB (per core)8 MB
L3 cache0 KB128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm7 nm+
Die size66 mm24x 81 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors123 million16,600 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Atom D425 and EPYC 7343 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCBGA559SP3
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt190 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom D425 and EPYC 7343. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3no data
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data

Security technologies

Atom D425 and EPYC 7343 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom D425 and EPYC 7343 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom D425 and EPYC 7343. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2, DDR3DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size4 GB4 TiB
Max memory channels1no data
Maximum memory bandwidth6.4 GB/s204.795 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel GMA 3150N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom D425 and EPYC 7343.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Atom D425 0.11
EPYC 7343 24.94
+22573%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Atom D425 185
Samples: 40
EPYC 7343 43778
+23564%
Samples: 13

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.11 24.94
Recency 21 June 2010 12 January 2021
Physical cores 1 16
Threads 2 32
Chip lithography 45 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 190 Watt

Atom D425 has 1800% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7343, on the other hand, has a 22573% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, 1500% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 543% more advanced lithography process.

The AMD EPYC 7343 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Atom D425 in performance tests.

Be aware that Atom D425 is a notebook processor while EPYC 7343 is a server/workstation one.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 68 votes

Rate Atom D425 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 25 votes

Rate EPYC 7343 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Atom D425 and EPYC 7343, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.