EPYC 7543 vs Atom D425

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Atom D425 and EPYC 7543 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated77
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data7.63
Market segmentLaptopServer
Seriesno dataAMD EPYC
Power efficiencyno data16.13
Architecture codenamePineview (2009−2011)Milan (2021−2023)
Release date21 June 2010 (14 years ago)15 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$993$3,761

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Atom D425 and EPYC 7543 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads264
Base clock speed1.8 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed1.83 GHz3.7 GHz
Multiplierno data28
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm7 nm+
Die size66 mm28x 81 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors123 million33,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Atom D425 and EPYC 7543 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCBGA559SP3
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt225 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom D425 and EPYC 7543. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3no data
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data

Security technologies

Atom D425 and EPYC 7543 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom D425 and EPYC 7543 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom D425 and EPYC 7543. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2, DDR3DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size4 GB4 TiB
Max memory channels1no data
Maximum memory bandwidth6.4 GB/s204.795 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel GMA 3150N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom D425 and EPYC 7543.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom D425 204
EPYC 7543 60901
+29753%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 21 June 2010 15 March 2021
Physical cores 1 32
Threads 2 64
Chip lithography 45 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 225 Watt

Atom D425 has 2150% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7543, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, 3100% more physical cores and 3100% more threads, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Atom D425 and EPYC 7543. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Atom D425 is a notebook processor while EPYC 7543 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom D425 and EPYC 7543, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom D425
Atom D425
AMD EPYC 7543
EPYC 7543

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 63 votes

Rate Atom D425 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 6 votes

Rate EPYC 7543 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom D425 or EPYC 7543, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.