Celeron G4900 vs Atom D425

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom D425
2010
1 core / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.13
Celeron G4900
2018
2 cores / 2 threads, 54 Watt
1.51
+1062%

Celeron G4900 outperforms Atom D425 by a whopping 1062% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Atom D425 and Celeron G4900 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking33332141
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data2.95
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron
Power efficiency1.232.80
Architecture codenamePineview (2009−2011)Coffee Lake (2017−2019)
Release date21 June 2010 (14 years ago)3 April 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$993$42

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Atom D425 and Celeron G4900 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed1.8 GHz3.1 GHz
Boost clock speed1.83 GHz3.1 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rateno data4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplierno data31
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm14 nm
Die size66 mm2126 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors123 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Atom D425 and Celeron G4900 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA559FCLGA1151
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt54 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom D425 and Celeron G4900. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-+
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States-+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data

Security technologies

Atom D425 and Celeron G4900 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
MPX-+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom D425 and Celeron G4900 are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x-+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom D425 and Celeron G4900. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2, DDR3DDR4-2400
Maximum memory size4 GB64 GB
Max memory channels12
Maximum memory bandwidth6.4 GB/s38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel GMA 3150Intel UHD Graphics 610
Max video memoryno data64 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.05 GHz
InTru 3Dno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Atom D425 and Celeron G4900 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Atom D425 and Celeron G4900 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096x2304@24Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data4096x2304@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Atom D425 and Celeron G4900 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom D425 and Celeron G4900.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Atom D425 0.13
Celeron G4900 1.51
+1062%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom D425 204
Celeron G4900 2397
+1075%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.13 1.51
Integrated graphics card 0.01 1.89
Recency 21 June 2010 3 April 2018
Physical cores 1 2
Chip lithography 45 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 54 Watt

Atom D425 has 440% lower power consumption.

Celeron G4900, on the other hand, has a 1061.5% higher aggregate performance score, 18800% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 7 years, 100% more physical cores, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

The Celeron G4900 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom D425 in performance tests.

Be aware that Atom D425 is a notebook processor while Celeron G4900 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom D425 and Celeron G4900, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom D425
Atom D425
Intel Celeron G4900
Celeron G4900

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 63 votes

Rate Atom D425 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 115 votes

Rate Celeron G4900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom D425 or Celeron G4900, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.