Athlon 64 LE-1640 vs Atom D425
Primary details
Comparing Atom D425 and Athlon 64 LE-1640 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 3334 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
Power efficiency | 1.23 | no data |
Architecture codename | Pineview (2009−2011) | Orleans (2007−2009) |
Release date | 21 June 2010 (14 years ago) | 7 January 2009 (15 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $993 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Atom D425 and Athlon 64 LE-1640 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
Threads | 2 | 1 |
Base clock speed | 1.8 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 1.83 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 512K |
L3 cache | 0 KB | 0 KB |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 90 nm |
Die size | 66 mm2 | 101.3 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 69 °C |
Number of transistors | 123 million | 154 million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Atom D425 and Athlon 64 LE-1640 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Socket | FCBGA559 | AM2 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 45 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom D425 and Athlon 64 LE-1640. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3 | no data |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | - | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
Idle States | - | no data |
Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
PAE | 32 Bit | no data |
Security technologies
Atom D425 and Athlon 64 LE-1640 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | - | no data |
EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom D425 and Athlon 64 LE-1640 are enumerated here.
VT-d | - | no data |
VT-x | - | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom D425 and Athlon 64 LE-1640. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR2, DDR3 | DDR2 |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 1 | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 6.4 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | Intel GMA 3150 | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom D425 and Athlon 64 LE-1640.
PCIe version | no data | 2.0 |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 21 June 2010 | 7 January 2009 |
Threads | 2 | 1 |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 90 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 45 Watt |
Atom D425 has an age advantage of 1 year, 100% more threads, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 350% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Atom D425 and Athlon 64 LE-1640. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Atom D425 is a notebook processor while Athlon 64 LE-1640 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Atom D425 and Athlon 64 LE-1640, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.