Core 2 Solo ULV SU3500 vs Atom D410
Primary details
Comparing Atom D410 and Core 2 Solo ULV SU3500 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Architecture codename | Pineview (2009−2011) | Penryn-L (2008−2009) |
| Release date | 4 January 2010 (14 years ago) | 29 March 2009 (15 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $636 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Atom D410 and Core 2 Solo ULV SU3500 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 1.66 GHz | 1.4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.67 GHz | 1.4 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 800 MHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 3 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | 66 mm2 | 107 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 123 million | 410 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | no data | 1.05V-1.15V |
Compatibility
Information on Atom D410 and Core 2 Solo ULV SU3500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FCBGA559 | BGA956 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 5.5 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom D410 and Core 2 Solo ULV SU3500. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3 | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | - | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | - |
| Idle States | - | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | - | - |
| PAE | 32 Bit | no data |
| FSB parity | no data | - |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
Security technologies
Atom D410 and Core 2 Solo ULV SU3500 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | + |
| EDB | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom D410 and Core 2 Solo ULV SU3500 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | - | no data |
| VT-x | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom D410 and Core 2 Solo ULV SU3500. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR2 | DDR1 |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 1 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 6.4 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel GMA 3150 | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 4 January 2010 | 29 March 2009 |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 5 Watt |
Atom D410 has an age advantage of 9 months, and 100% more threads.
Core 2 Solo ULV SU3500, on the other hand, has 100% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Atom D410 and Core 2 Solo ULV SU3500. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Atom D410 and Core 2 Solo ULV SU3500, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
