E2-3000 vs Atom D2700

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom D2700
2011
2 cores / 4 threads, 10 Watt
0.28
E2-3000
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.45
+60.7%

E2-3000 outperforms Atom D2700 by an impressive 61% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Atom D2700 and E2-3000 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking31292943
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel AtomAMD E-Series
Power efficiency2.662.86
Architecture codenameCedarview (2011−2012)Kabini (2013−2014)
Release date1 November 2011 (13 years ago)23 May 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$52no data

Detailed specifications

Atom D2700 and E2-3000 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2.13 GHzno data
Boost clock speed0.13 GHz1.65 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache512K (per core)1024 KB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm28 nm
Die size66 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data90 °C
Number of transistors176 million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Atom D2700 and E2-3000 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA559FT3
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom D2700 and E2-3000. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE386x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX
AES-NI-+
FMA-FMA4
AVX-+
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
VirusProtect-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE36 Bitno data
AMT-no data
HD Audio+no data

Security technologies

Atom D2700 and E2-3000 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom D2700 and E2-3000 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x-no data
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom D2700 and E2-3000. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size4 GBno data
Max memory channels11
Maximum memory bandwidth6.4 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650 (640 MHz)AMD Radeon HD 8280
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Atom D2700 and E2-3000 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Atom D2700 and E2-3000 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom D2700 and E2-3000.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanes4no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Number of USB ports8no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Atom D2700 0.28
E2-3000 0.45
+60.7%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom D2700 456
E2-3000 726
+59.2%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.28 0.45
Recency 1 November 2011 23 May 2013
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 15 Watt

Atom D2700 has 100% more threads, and 50% lower power consumption.

E2-3000, on the other hand, has a 60.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

The E2-3000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom D2700 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom D2700 and E2-3000, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom D2700
Atom D2700
AMD E2-3000
E2-3000

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 30 votes

Rate Atom D2700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 26 votes

Rate E2-3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom D2700 or E2-3000, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.