Processor N200 vs Atom D2560
Aggregate performance score
Processor N200 outperforms Atom D2560 by a whopping 464% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3456 | 2438 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 4.51 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Atom | Intel Alder Lake-N |
| Power efficiency | 1.05 | 9.92 |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Manufacturer | no data | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Cedarview (2011−2012) | Alder Lake-N (2023) |
| Release date | 24 October 2012 (13 years ago) | 3 January 2023 (3 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $193 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of Atom D2560 and Processor N200: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 2 GHz | 0.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 96 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 2 MB (shared) |
| L3 cache | 1 MB | 6 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 10 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | 105 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| VID voltage range | 0.91V -1.21V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Atom D2560 and Processor N200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | FCBGA559 | Intel BGA 1264 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 6 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom D2560 and Processor N200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3 | no data |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| vPro | - | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
| PAE | 36 Bit | no data |
Security technologies
Atom D2560 and Processor N200 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom D2560 and Processor N200 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | - | + |
| VT-x | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom D2560 and Processor N200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3-800, DDR3-1066 | DDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channel |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 1 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 6.4 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650 (640 MHz) | Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) (450 - 750 MHz) |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Atom D2560 and Processor N200 integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | 2 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom D2560 and Processor N200.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 4 | 9 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.25 | 1.41 |
| Recency | 24 October 2012 | 3 January 2023 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 6 Watt |
Processor N200 has a 464% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, 100% more physical cores, a 220% more advanced lithography process, and 67% lower power consumption.
The Intel Processor N200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Atom D2560 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
